Detransitioner TullipR’s Grim Reality

TullipR (Ritchie) has been highlighted in previous posts. Here is an extended Twitter thread explaining the consequences of his Transgender surgery. Ritchie is a 35 year old UK detransitioned man who medically transitioned at age 26 and has been on hormone replacement therapy since.

Read the whole thread here.

This is madness.

Maybe the secret is to fix the brain. Not the body.

As a Christian who believes in the doctrine of Creation, Incarnation, Bodily Resurrection, Bodily Ascension, and future bodily resurrection for believers, I could never agree with Gender Ideologues nor the bodily harm they recommend to confused people like Ritchie.


For more information on the science behind Transgenderism and Gender Ideology. Read these posts.

+++

As a Classic Christian I encourage everyone to “Embrace, Don’t Affirm.”

Individuals with a Gender Identity Disorder (Gender-Dysphoria) need Truth-filled Love. Please read this post for more details.

+++

Politicians Refuse to Define ‘Woman’ or ‘Trans’

From the same “evidence” session of my last post. Scottish Politicians simply won’t define key categories or admit to their “circular” reasoning.

The consequences of extending a Gender Recognition Certificate to anyone who simply says they are Trans (self-ID) without any clinical diagnosis of Gender-Dysphoria or any period of time in which they have taken cross-sex hormones or sought gender reassignment surgery is to allow biological males with penises to access female spaces, whether in sport or in spa showers.

TWITTER CLIP BLOCKED.


Please see this post about a real world consequence: Female Inmate Speaks Out About Male Transfers.

Gender Ideology says only our internal feelings matter. Biology doesn’t. The BODY is an ‘immaterial’ legal consideration.

Is this the world we want to live in?

+++

Love Refuses to Affirm Confusion

Women Are Entitled To Male Free Spaces

When did this become a necessary thing to say?

From today’s evidence session for the Scottish reconsideration of the Gender Recognition Act (2004), a reconsideration that would allow “self-ID” to be the only relevant fact before extending a Gender Recognition Certificate to those identifying as Transgender.

Please see this post for more info on the GRA 2004 and “self-ID”

+++