Parents Face Prosecution If They Don’t ‘Affirm’

From the Dailymail about new law in Victoria, a state in southeastern Australia.

A new Victorian law which forces mothers and fathers to accept their children's desire to change gender has left distraught parents fearing prosecution if they do anything to try to prevent potentially harmful and irreversible treatment.

So far-reaching is the new law that even trying to arrange counselling and expert assessment for their kids could lead to parents - and the mental health professionals - being prosecuted if the advice did anything other than affirm the children's newly-discovered gender dysphoria.

Many parents feel trapped, unable to do anything to prevent their children pursuing  potentially irreversible and harmful changes - from chest-binding to taking hormone blockers and ultimately sex-change surgery.

The article continues…

The Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission has been tasked with policing the Act.

Its website states it is now an offence for a parent to refuse to support their child's request for medical treatment that will prevent physical changes from puberty that do not align with the child's new gender identity, and it is also an offence to deny their child access to any health care services that would affirm that identity.

And in case any parents thought they could seek counselling for their children outside Victoria, the Act now makes that an offence too.

And so too is telling your child to reflect further before going ahead with gender transition, with the Commission's website warning parents that the definition of gender suppression could include 'wait and see' approaches, and not just overt opposition to the children's wishes.  

Very worrying development for Aussie parents and kids.

Full Article.

+++

‘Conversion Therapy’ In A Time Of Deceit & Bullying

Those who derisively labeled psychotherapist Stella 0’Malley a “conversion therapist” are facing hard questions now that the U.K.’s Youth Gender Identity Clinic, The Tavistock, has been closed down. O’Malley favors Gender Exploratory Therapy and not the narrow-minded gender affirmative model, the narrow model heavily criticized by the independent Cass Review, resulting in the shuttering of The Tavistock.

For someone like me, who has worked as a psychotherapist for many years, trying to explain why conventional talk therapy approach is more useful than blind affirmation is like trying to explain that water is wet. I get the splutters. For example, if a client seeks therapy for their fear of flying, I wouldn’t mindlessly nod along as he tells me that he should avoid all aeroplanes, and nor would I actively help him to try to remove aeroplanes out of the sky for fear that it might be triggering for him. Empathy comes very easily to me and I think my empathy is the trait that I value most in my psychotherapeutic work. So if a client had a fear of flying, I would gently engage in a collaborative therapeutic process that would work through the inner workings of his psyche. It is through reflective dialogue that helps the client to make their own decisions and this is why exploratory therapy is pretty much a fundamental aspect of every therapeutic approach – other than the affirmative approach.

The gender affirmative care model is an experimental approach to gender identity that has only been in existence since 2012. The Cass Review has recently described this approach as “not a safe or viable long-term option” for children. Gender affirmative therapy has been described as the “nodding-dog approach” where therapists act only as facilitators, without offering any exploratory thought or thought-provoking analysis, or encouraging the individual to consider their unconscious motivations. The gender affirmative approach is child-led rather than child-centered and promotes early and aggressive medical intervention for children. Advocates for this approach tell us that children between one and two years old can give a “pre-verbal communication” about gender. There are four stages to this approach: first the child socially transitions whenever they want, which entails a name change, a pronoun change and going to different toilets. Then puberty blockers are offered when the child reaches puberty. After that, cross-sex hormones are offered, and then finally when they’re an adult, surgery is offered.

Read the Whole Thing

Companion Posts


+++

The Gender Conversion Debate

This is a follow-up from the last Conversion Therapy? post.

A gay man, a lesbian and a straight guy (Bill Maher) have caught hell for questioning the accepted Gender Identity narrative.

[Standard link disclaimer1Links from this blog to online resources don’t necessarily mean I support everything found there. But as adults we should embrace viewpoint diversity. And make alliances where we can.]



Who is the Conversion Therapist?

Is it the one who is trying to help a person align their thoughts and feelings with the body they were given at birth or the professional who disregards the body and proposes irreversible radical surgeries combined with life-long hormone treatments in hopes of aligning the outer body with a patient’s inner desires?

+++

Love Refuses to Affirm Confusion