Western Cultural Imperialists from a wide variety of Western governments and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO’s) are grooming the children of Africa.
They teach children as young as 10 years old from a training manual that includes a comprehensive list of “Sexual Patterns and Behaviours.”
The list includes the patterns and behaviours you might expect, plus some you might not:
Voyeurism: Sexual excitement from observing others undress, making love, kissing, petting or masturbating. Sometimes voyeurs are called “Peeping Toms”.
Gerontosexual: Sexual pleasure from elderly by a young person.
Paedophilia: Sexual pleasure by having sexual intercourse with children.
Paedarasty: Sexual pleasure from young boys.
Zoophilia/Beastiality: Sexual pleasure from animals
Urophilia: Sexual plasure from urine.
Coprophilia: Sexual pleasure from filth such as faeces, dirt, or soiled underwear.
Sadism: Sexual pleasure from inflicting pain to another person.
At the end of which the students are taught some very important cross-cultural perspective.
“IMPORTANT!Some of these behaviors are acceptable in some cultures while others are considered as deviant in some cultures….”
I could be tempted to wager a small sum that not one of these “patterns & behaviours” will be described by a Sex-Ed trainer as deviant in all cultures. Wouldn’t that risk the evil of stigmatization? If you think I’m being overly cynical, read this.
I do hope the children were not left to ponder that question on their own. But what is the purpose of including some of these? Do you get a ”warm fuzzy” about the reason for those inclusions? I don’t. These materials were to be used with 10 year olds! They will also learn how to properly use an anal sex toy should the need arise.
Well, here’s the video. Take a look for yourself.
You wonder why countries in the non-Western world have a problem with Western values related to human sexuality?
You just saw one very big reason. Sex-saturated Western Entertainment media and the “dark caverns” of the Internet would be two others. One need not be a sexual prude to be concerned about this cultural imperialism.
+++
If you haven’t already added your email to my list, do so and I’ll let you know when the blog is updated.
Okay. I watched the following public service announcement (PSA) several times this weekend while enjoying Men’s College Basketball via Hulu.
Love March Madness!
Adidas featured a commercial which highlighted a transgender athlete. It also ran repeatedly. We got a Gender-Ideology full-press this weekend.
In the PSA below the sports of soccer, basketball, field hockey, and gymnastics were highlighted. Now, if the team camaraderie encouraged in this PSA is just for the purpose of organizing local pickup games, like at the YMCA, I don’t see any problem with boys and girls playing together, within reason (is there much left these days?).
But once it gets really serious, and the stakes are higher, say, with organized High School athletics and beyond, like it is with men’s March Madness, you are smokin’ weed or something worse if you think post-pubescent biological men and women can and should compete together.
Full contact sport, with men and women competing together?
That’s insane.
Here’s the 30 sec PSA….
Another thing about this PSA. It highlights team sport.
What about those sports that are mostly about individual achievement? Say swimming? Or Boxing? Mix Martial Arts? Wrestling? Figure Skating? Or like some of the ones you’ll find later in this post?
Yet even in team sport we would have an “inclusion” problem. Maybe Team A has included 3 biological males and they start for Team A’s basketball squad. Their opponent has the more traditional, less inclusive, 5 out of 5 biological female starters. Are you gonna tell me that the difference in those bodies doesn’t matter?
Have you seen how physical and fast, and yes, more athletic, men’s basketball is compared to women’s basketball? There is a good reason for that.
Stop denying the madness. A Transwoman is not a real woman.
Real World Examples
Why do you think the Ukrainian government refused to allow able bodied males between the ages of 18 and 59 to leave Ukraine? Was that just another example of deep seated old-world patriarchy? Something the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) human relation’s folk would find deeply offensive and legally actionable? Do you think the women and children of Ukraine would want to minimize, for the sake of inclusion, those male-bodied capabilities right now?
Not on their life, they wouldn’t.
The PSA above propagandizes a radical “gender neutral” agenda. No-doubt facilitated by young people who have watched too many Saturday morning cartoons where the female superheroes “kick ass” just like the males. This fiction is also made easier because our young people have been groomed from Kindergarten to think male/female body differences don’t matter or are irrelevant.
See the following posts for more information about how our schools have developed this agenda and have also co-opted parental prerogatives.
And these posts for more information on how Gender Ideology impacts women's sport.
Here in the real world of sport, post-pubescent male length of bone, muscle mass, and natural testosterone infused aggressiveness, etc., will leave females in the dust. Or injure them. Anyone who thinks otherwise is dreaming. And probably agenda driven.
Is that the world we want to live in?
This is not about discouraging anyone genuinely confused about their sex or gender identity from playing pickup games during school gym class.
This is about refusing to recognize that when it comes to competitive sport, where potential scholarships are on the line, and perhaps the slight chance of a professional contract awaits, the body deniers among us are living in a dangerous fantasy world, a world that doesn’t care about female athletes.
In 2017 at the Connecticut State High School Track and Field Championship Andraya Yearwood won the women’s 100 meter and 200 meter races. Bully for her. Right? But here’s the problem. Andraya is a biological male. In Connecticut, students are allowed to play sports in accordance with their gender identity regardless of medical transition status. Andraya underwent no medical interventions prior to winning. No puberty blockers. No cross-sex hormones, in this case estrogen. “She” simply identified as “female” and proceeded to crush the competition.
This was allowed because the Connecticut Athletic Association along with several other state athletic associations has been captured by Gender Ideology. If you think the increased length of bone, muscle mass, heart and lung size of post pubescent males doesn’t confer a male advantage in a sport where speed and strength matter then you need to
You can read about 4 biological female athletes who filed suit against the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) here.
Hannah Mouncey, who transitioned at age 26, is 6ft 2 in and weighs 220lb. Mouncey is a biological male but participates in a female Australian Rules Football league and pulverizes female players on the field. A picture is worth more than words.
Is this fair? Or is there an intrinsic injustice of pitting one sort of sexed body against another very different sort?
I’m with the real girls on this one.And against the body deniers among us.
The “Gender Identity and Expression” movement has a multitude of legal and cultural ramifications that most people have yet to think about in their rush to “affirm” confused individual choice for the sake of being, or being seen as, inclusive and/or non-bigoted.
To my Conservative friends, put down the pitchforks and read Abigail Shrier’s latest piece. And change your strategy. Unite with moderates and those on the political left who support science, common sense and oppose fantasy. For they are many.
+++
If you’ve just found my blog and are intrigued about this issue, and want to learn more, I highly recommend a book by Abigail Shrier.
Shrier is a graduate of Columbia College who went on to earn a bachelor of philosophy degree from the University of Oxford and a JD from Yale Law School. Her book Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughterswas named a “best book” by The Economist and The Times of London. [2020, 2021]
[As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.]