Blue Ridge Style & Beyond
Rowling continues to not go away. She believes biology matters and males, born male, can never become females. Nor be allowed to enter female spaces that were made female spaces for a reason.
For her persistance she gets this. A post from June 14. It’s July 2.
And Twitter “yawns.” Enforcing rules equally?
+++
There has sometimes been an anarchistic impulse in street supporters of Gender Ideology. An unholy amalgamation of Marx, Freud & Nietzsche spills out of them uncontrollably. They scream against ‘oppression’. They idolize ‘sexual desire & fulfillment.’ And they pronounce a pox on all ‘metanarratives.’
Like the one which says biology really, really matters.
Ironically they pine most aggressively for ‘inclusion’ and yet are some of the most ‘exclusive’ bloaks you’ll ever meet. Masked men in black, screaming at women face to face. Women gathered to champion Sex-Based Rights. Women who pine for female spaces where biological men with fully intact penises shouldn’t be allowed to enter.
You don’t need to always agree with Gender-Critical Feminists to defend their right to peacefully press their urgent concerns. And persuade citizens to support their cause.
An organizer of a Bristol, UK women’s gathering, Kellie-Jay Keen, (woman in green below), a so-called TERF (Trans-Exclusionary-Radical-Feminist), was confronted by a particularly uncivil anarchist.
He’s the one who called her a ‘fascist piece of sh##!’
Antifa-Anarchists are not especially known for elegant articulations. Dramatic intimidation seems better suited to push ‘dinosaurs’ like Keen toward extinction.
Or so they think.
Bottom row of previous image was an event held a few weeks ago in Manchester, UK. One Black Pamper is seen ‘manhandling’ a feminist for daring to fly a suffragette flag in front of a statue of suffragette Emmeline Pankhurst.
You will find similar confrontations on college and university campuses across the western world.
Our ‘children’ need to grow up.
Is this the world we want to live in?
See companion post for a healthy alternative.
+++
Kara Dansky authored The Abolition of Sex, which I have read, and was an ACLU public defender for 15 years. She is also a gender critical feminist who warns; “Mainstream liberals have no idea what the consequences” will be of putting the following line in a proposed Congressional bill called the Equality Act:
Self described liberal journalist, Matt Taibbi interviews Dansky in his latest Substack piece.
Here are a few quotes.
Matt Taibbi: There’s an interesting passage in The Abolition of Sex where you talk about how feminists are used to getting this treatment from the right, not so used to getting it from the left. What’s happening there? Kara Dansky: I think a lot of people are very confused, and I think that’s completely understandable because our media has confused them. I think people really don’t know what’s going on. There’s a bill I don’t think we’ve talked about, called the Equality Act… It was originally introduced in 2015 by Senator Merkley. If you read about it in mainstream papers, it’ll say that it’s meant to protect LGBTQ people, but what it does is it completely redefines the word sex to include so-called gender identity. It does that explicitly. It says “sex (including gender identity).” Mainstream liberals have no idea what the consequences of that are. For example, in California today, there is a public accommodation state law that defines sex in the most ridiculous, garbled, meaningless way, but one thing it does is it includes gender identity. It was on that basis that a man was permitted to enter the women’s section of the nude spa and expose himself, basically. The Equality Act would do what California already does in public accommodations all over the country. Any man can enter any space that is supposed to be designated for women whenever he wants to, on the basis of his so-called gender identity. Matt Taibbi: Critics will say, “So what?” What’s the real consequence? Why shouldn’t we just get over it and change our thinking, as was done with other movements? Kara Dansky: We’re literally dealing with a situation today where female prisoners are being housed in prisons with male rapists and murderers. That is actually happening. That’s not theoretical. I really think that that needs to be a national scandal, and I don’t understand... When a local Seattle station picks up a story in March of 2021 about male prisoners and rapists being housed in the women’s prison, and not a single national outlet picks it up, I just think that’s astonishing. That’s very real. It’s literally happening today, right now. Matt Taibbi: Here’s the disconnect for me. There’s so much attention and sensitivity to the issue of violence against women in all other arenas — except this one. Do you have an explanation for that? Kara Dansky: It is astonishing. Well, I don’t really get to ask that question to people on the left or media. When I ask that question to conservatives, they’re blown away. They agree with the question, and they don’t understand it either. But you’re right. If a man exposes himself on a bus, he will be charged with a crime, rightfully so. The victim of that crime is going to say, “This is an example of Me Too.” But if a man exposes himself in the naked section of a women’s spa, under California law, he gets to be validated as stunning and brave. The reason you’re having a disconnect is that it doesn’t make sense. Often, I forget. I reached the point a long time ago that I just had to accept that this doesn’t make sense. It doesn’t make sense in terms of logic, and it doesn’t make sense in terms of politics. That’s just the situation we’re dealing with.
+++