Woman Who Removed Breasts as Transgender Shares Breastfeeding pain

Wyspiański, Stanisław (1869-1907) (malarz); Macierzyństwo, portret żony artysty Teofili z synem Stasiem; 1902; pastel; papier żeberkowy z filigranem (VIDALON, na tekturze); 62,5 x 46,5 [w świetle oprawy]

Elizabeth, not her real name, had her breasts removed at 20. Now a Detransitioner at 30 she has a baby boy.

‘It was really hard knowing that he wanted to breastfeed, and I couldn’t give him that. And when they put him on my stomach, he crawled up. He was looking for my breasts and he couldn’t find them,’ she said.

Elizabeth

Researcher Professor Karleen Gribble told Daily Mail Australia Elizabeth’s story ‘may be the tip of the iceberg’ and should serve as an early warning signal to others.

‘It is a very serious business to remove the breast of young females and the ramifications for them down the track might be significant and if they do have babies, they are going to need support around that,’ Professor Gribble said.
‘There needs to be greater respect for breastfeeding and its significance for women and children.

‘Once you have a mastectomy there is no such thing as a reversal. This is irreversible surgery it shouldn’t be undertaken lightly.’

Elizabeth claimed the surgeon never discussed breastfeeding with her before the surgery.

‘I don’t think I would have been receptive. I would have felt insulted, and I would have said it’s triggering my gender dysphoria,’ she said.

Elizabeth attributed her gender dysphoria to developing breasts at the age of 10, which led to her being sexually harassed by men.

FULL STORY

+++

Detransitioners Are Being Abandoned By Medical Professionals Who Devastated Their Bodies And Minds

Health providers won’t help detransitioners who seek to undo the damage of transgender surgery and hormones.

Prisha Mosley – Detransitioner

After being swarmed by health providers who enabled her to medically transition as a minor, Prisha Mosley now says she’s been abandoned by the medical community as she attempts to navigate a complicated and painful detransition.

“I was under the impression that my doctors, who were transitioning me, loved me. They said they didn’t want me to die, they were saving my life, they were worried about me, and they wanted me to be healthy and happy,” Prisha told me. “Clearly, they don’t love me. As soon as it’s not profitable, they don’t want to help.”

Prisha has a slew of medical complications dating back to the more than five years she spent on testosterone and a double mastectomy that a plastic surgeon performed shortly after she turned 18. Many of those complications surround her endocrine system, which encompasses the hormones that regulate nearly every process in the body, from metabolism to growth and development, emotions, mood, sexual function, and sleep.

FULL STORY

+++

Love Refuses To Affirm Confusion

Harmful Phrases?

What you are about to read is one important reason for the dramatic shift in perspective taking place in the Western world. We are being told that certain language, language rooted in science and, well, language previously understood as representing REALITY is somehow harmful to those who don’t subscribed to previously understood REALITY.

Dare I say, Christian reality?

So, we ole “reality” dogs must stand down and refrain from barking. To do otherwise is to offend anyone subscribing to a new way of understanding what is real and important. For example: We must affirm every individual iteration of the human self. We are told. Or we are unloving, and perhaps worse, full of hate.

This is insane.

And it’s social suicide.

Human’s created in God’s image will not survive this assault, unless they stand in the path of this social juggernaut and say…

NO! YOU SHALL NOT PASS!


We are being advised by some medical professionals to:

Replace female with ‘egg-producing’ and avoid using the term ‘fitness’, woke scientists say in push to get rid of ‘harmful’ phrases

Woke scientists have called for the terms male and female to be replaced as part of a crackdown on ‘harmful terminology’ in science.

Instead, ‘sperm-producing’ and ‘egg-producing’ or ‘XY/XX individual’ should be used to avoid reinforcing ‘societally-imposed ideas of a sex binary’, researchers suggest.

Even the terms mother, father and fitness are in the firing line. 

This anti-real, anti-body (and speaking as a Christian, anti-creational) insanity is at the root of much “anti-bullying” rhetoric in the public sphere today. Which includes the so-called “safe-guarding” push in our public schools and other institutions for the purpose of protecting the “marginalized” among us.

Nevertheless, speaking scientifically. And Christianly.

I can’t imagine any language more empirically or scripturally grounded than the male – female sex binary. Without that interactive binary entire species in God’s Good Creation could not possibly exist. Yet we are now being told that we should forgo the use of such language. And presumably transcend the limitations of this “demeaning” material world of embodied humanity.

They tell us, in the name of love, the limitations of all “old-fashioned” “socially constructed” and “harmful” language must be transcended. This must be done for the sake of those who don’t subscribe to that outdated reality. “You do want to love all people, don’t you?”

Folks. Don’t fall for this. We are not truly safeguarding the healthy development of our children if we support this insane gender ideology in the name of “love.”

Love divorced from Truth is not love.

FULL STOP.

Story here.

+++

Love Refuses To Affirm Confusion