The Immutable “Trans Soul” and Radical Dualism

Here is a splendid article by Bernard Lane about the dramatic policy change in Britain resulting in the closing of the countries only youth gender clinic, the Tavistock.

Some grab graphs for us Americans.

In plain terms, the verdict against the Tavistock is that its staff allowed gender ideology and experimental drugs to crowd out prudent medicine and exploratory psychotherapy that ought to be open to the full range of possible reasons for a troubled child’s distress. An American-style “gender affirming” treatment model zeroed in on a dysphoric child’s supposedly immutable trans soul, and gave too little weight to a patient’s more earthly issues such as psychiatric disorders, struggles with same-sex attraction, autism, or family trauma. Though nobody can prove the existence of a trans soul, gender dysphoria had a history in psychiatric diagnosis that met the bar of health insurers. But the condition is unusual because it involves what is in effect a Cartesian dualist intervention, by which hormonal drugs and surgery are used to make the body’s appearance accord with the mind’s idea of how it should be.

Our current Western obsession with radical dualism, the notion that only my inner feelings and desires and thoughts are relevant to who I am. My body, so to speak, has no say in the matter and may be regarded as entirely dispensable if “my authentic self” my soul says so.

This erroneous ideology is at the root of today’s disembodiment madness (I speak as a Christian here). Ideally, soul and body exist as an integrated unit. That is God’s intent. We must help those who experience body discomfort to reconcile with their bodies. Bodies given to them through their parents, which is to say, God-given bodies.

Let us not deny God’s Good Creation.

I tried to find an appropriate public domain image that shows the soul trying to escape the ‘prison cell’ of the body. Unsurprisingly, I found many at DeviantArt.com. But they were subject to copyright. So I couldn’t use them. Long-time readers may remember that web-site.

You can read about how DeviantArt.com is a central location where gender-confused kids hang-out and get indoctrinated with radical dualism and Trans/Gender-Fluid Ideology in the “Parental Authority and Our Schools” blogpost below. These worldviews cultivate a desire to hate and thus escape our ‘horrible bodies.’ An ancient Christian heresy, called Gnosticism seems to always be ‘hangin’ round the house.’


As the Brits are reconsidering their approach to the problem of gender-dysphoria, Bernard Lane asks:

Are there lessons for countries such as the United StatesCanadaAustraliaNew ZealandGermany, and Spain, where, so far, dogmatic slogans have trumped critical thought? American trans activists denounce Britain as “TERF Island.” (“TERF” stands for “trans exclusionary radical feminist,” a term of abuse that, of late, has been adopted as a sort of ironic badge of honour by gender-critical feminists.) It seems as if some type of British exceptionalism is asserting itself in resistance to the trans zeitgeist that permeates many other Western countries.

“TERFs” outside the UK might wonder if it’s possible to clone JK Rowling, the gender-critical Harry Potter writer who’s followed the Tavistock saga closely, presciently declaring two years ago that “it feels as though we’re on the brink of a medical scandal.” Her 3,600-word open letter, written a month before that, serves as a plain English explainer for those puzzled about gender ideology, sex-based rights, the fury of trans-rights activists, and the alarming surge in teenage girls seeking a chemical and surgical escape route out of the female category. (In writing it, Rowling quoted from a January 2020 Quillette article in which former Tavistock psychoanalyst Marcus Evans explained why he’d resigned and turned whistleblower. He also picked apart the irresponsible “transition or suicide” narrative that activists—and even patients—sometimes cite as a tactic to push aside legitimate concerns.) Rowling may be a one-off, but all countries have at least some influential voices of concern that are able to reach large audiences with the message that medicalisation of children is not something to be celebrated. And those voices should be amplified.

Great summary article of what happened in Britain. Shuttering the Tavistock. (Read the whole thing.)

Are American’s paying attention? And/or has critical thought been trumped by dogmatic slogans? Our children are in trouble. Our culture is in trouble.

Relevant “Good Creation” posts.

+++

As a Classic Christian I encourage everyone to “Embrace, Don’t Affirm.”

Individuals with a Gender Identity Disorder (Gender-Dysphoria) need Truth-filled Love. Please read this post for more details.

+++

The Tavistock Falling Domino Hits Australia.

“It begins!” by mckinney75402 is licensed under CC BY 2.0.
Australian gender clinics are under fresh scrutiny and face calls for an independent review of their prescription of puberty blockers to teenagers after a leading British clinic was closed down over safety concerns.

The ordered close of the Tavistock Clinic – the model for treating trans people around the world – on Thursday followed concerns raised by doctors that young ­patients were being referred on to a gender transitioning path too quickly and that there was insufficient evidence as to the long-term cognitive and physical impacts of puberty blockers.

With several major Australian gender clinics based at children’s hospitals having been strongly influenced by the Tavistock Clinic, some doctors say the findings of the British review by Dr Hilary Cass are likely to apply equally in Australia amid a dominance of a “gender affirming” approach to treating gender dysphoria.

Source:  The Australian

Is Canada, and perhaps the U.S. next? Here’s hoping.

“Puberty blockers, rather than acting as a “pause button” allowing children time to explore their identity, seem to lock them into a medicalised treatment pathway,” Dr Cass’s interim report said.

Full Story Here.

+++

The Beginning of the End of ‘Gender-Affirming Care’?

Britain is closing the infamous Tavistock Centre. Finland and Sweden have radically revised their treatment guidelines. But American doctors are advertising surgeries to children on TikTok. 

Stop the madness!

Lisa Selin Davis offers some common sense:

Over the past three decades, the Gender and Identity Development Service at the Tavistock Clinic in London has seen thousands of British children for gender dysphoria, with a British minister noting a more than 4,000 percent increase of referrals for girls alone in the last decade. But on Thursday, Britain’s National Health Service announced that it was closing down Tavistock for good—and, in effect, rebuking the common American medical approach known as “gender-affirming care” for treating children with gender dysphoria. This can include a mix of puberty suppressants, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries, interventions in minors that can lead to irreversible effects.

-----

The question is how Americans will react.

In a sign that they may be rethinking the “puberty blockers are safe and reversible” dogma, the Food and Drug Administration, also on Thursday, announced that it was slapping a new warning on puberty blockers. It turns out they may cause brain swelling and vision loss. But for now, the move among American medical associations, health officials and dozens of gender clinics is to double down on the affirmative approach, with the Biden administration recently asserting gender affirmation is “trauma-informed care.”

The American stance is at odds with a growing consensus in the West to exercise extreme caution when it comes to transitioning young people. Uber-progressive countries like Sweden and Finland have pushed back—firmly and unapologetically—against the affirmative approach of encouraging youth transition advocated by some transgender activists and gender clinicians. 

Sweden’s National Board of Health and Welfare released new guidelines for treating young people with gender dysphoria earlier this year. The new guidelines state that the risks of these “gender-affirming” medical interventions “currently outweigh the possible benefits, and that the treatments should be offered only in exceptional cases.”

Source:  Common Sense News. (emphasis mine)

Read the whole thing!

+++

What Have We Done To Our Children?