Category: Transgender Ideology

Posted on

Feminist Facing Up to Three Years in Prison Over Tweets

Christina Ellingsen Is Under Investigation In Norway

In a Tweet she questioned the belief that men (biological males) could be lesbians. Police are investigating because in January 2021 Norway introduced “gender identity” into their hate crime policy. And now women are being persecuted for stating biological facts.

Full Story here. 

"I am under police investigation for campaigning for women’s rights, because to certain groups, the fact that women and girls are female and that men cannot be women, girls, mothers or lesbians, is considered hateful,” Ellingsen told Reduxx. 

"Women are not protected against hate speech in Norway, but men who claim to be both lesbian and a woman, are protected both on the grounds of gender identity and on the grounds of sexual orientation,” Ellingsen said. 

"The fact that police are legally able to investigate and persecute women who engage in women’s rights is concerning. This is new territory in Norway, so the outcome of the investigation is important, both if the case is dismissed and if it leads to trial.”

In 2021, a Norwegian man was sentenced to 21 days in prison and a fine of 15,000NRK after being found guilty of “insulting” and “misgendering” a trans-identified male on Facebook.

Is this the world we want to live in?

+++

Posted on

Designed At Birth, Not “Assigned At Birth”

Bodies born with the anatomy in the pictures below are indisputably female bodies. If you don’t have this potential reproductive capacity because a disorder keeps your body from functioning normally then you are still a valued female.

If you are born with none of these potential capacities, this means you are a valued male. And that will never change. No matter how much you desire that change. Of course, humans are more than just their reproductive capacities. But they are not less.

This is bedrock folks. And we build from there.

Women Are Amazing

We must always tell what we see. Above all, and this is more difficult, we must always see what we see.

Charles Pequy

+++

Love Refuses to Affirm Confusion

Posted on

Philosopher Says Stop Linguistic Colonialism

In the U.K. a man of the political Left, philosopher Jon Pike, responds to Labour MP Stella Creasy, and says to Madam Creasy that the word “female” should mean something objective.

Of course most of us believe Sex is objective. Not subjective. Based on all kinds of immutable markers. Gametes (sperm or ova). Chromosomes. Hormones. Genitals (penis or vulva).

Which is to say, reproductive capacities loom large in the definition of Sex, and hence, terms like male and female.

Yet the Linguistic Colonialists among us want to blur important terms to achieve political goals, goals which they say will bring about diversity, equity and inclusion. But by taking the word “female” and turning it into a matter of “gender identity” you’ve distorted beyond hope any further discussion of the meaning of the term. If we say a word can mean whatever anyone wants it to mean, for the sake of inclusion, or any other “noble” goal, then that word is meaningless. And obviously cannot be debated. Which is of course the goal of gender ideologues. No discussion. Just inclusion. And affirmation. Objectivity be damned. Full Stop.

But we are still left with real differences to be explained. Aren’t we? I mean, if we have eyes to see. What language to use then? The redefinition of terms is a standard “trope” within trans activism so that regular folk are left befuddled and unaware of trans activist goals.

What are those goals? A radical, technologically astute, reordering of society that transcends material limitations. What, making us like God?

Well, sorta. Most of them don’t believe in ”God” just “progress.”

Obviously, Christians like myself, who know God created a material world and called it good cannot accept that kind of “progressive” social reordering.

Radicals move us along that reordering line by changing the meaning of essential words in ordinary discourse and debate. Thereby colonizing our language.

“Of course I’m for “females”, and “women” who isn’t these days?”

Well…pay close attention. Don’t assume you know what is being said. Verbal sands are shifting. Entire territories are being ”appropriated.”

+++