Gender Ideology Separates Mother From Daughter

Because this mother would not “affirm” her daughter’s identity, the courts decided that the daughter was “no longer mentally or emotionally safe.” She lives less than ten minutes away, but can only communicate with her daughter by U.S. Mail. All because she insists there is nothing wrong with her daughter. Her daughter was not born in the wrong body. Her daughter is a girl. Not a boy.

(Click to view video)


As a Classic Christian I encourage everyone to “Embrace, Don’t Affirm.”

Individuals with a Gender Identity Disorder (Gender-Dysphoria) need Truth-filled Love. Please read this post for more details.

+++

Love Refuses to Affirm Confusion

Father’s Milk?

The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine (ABM) is asking US Hospitals to use the term ‘father’s milk’ in new language guide.

I don’t think this will go well.

The guideline also includes words “chestfeeding,” “human milk feeding,” and “lactating person” to use in place of “traditional terms” like breastfeeding, nursing mother and breast.

Table 1 of ABM Position Statement and Guideline

The guideline explains:

"ABM recognizes that not all people who give birth and lactate identify as female, and that some individuals identify as neither female nor male. The statement states that to be inclusive to all people in written materials, the use of desexed or gender-inclusive language is appropriate in many settings."

Full Statement and Guideline here.


Previous posts on subject


Macierzyństwo (“Maternity”), a 1902 painting by Stanisław Wyspiański
Public Domain

+++

Love Refuses to Affirm Confusion

A Corporate Case To Support Adoption, Not Abortion

Made by Peter Rex, Founder and CEO, of REX (which builds and invests in tech companies). He just wrote an opinion piece at Newsweek.com

Corporate America is fully on board the abortion bandwagon. In the wake of the Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wadedozens of the country's biggest businesses announced plans to pay for employees to travel to obtain abortions. From Amazon to Bank of America to the New York Times and beyond, these companies are not only offering thousands of dollars or extra health insurance coverage to their team members, they're also picking sides in the abortion debate.

Yet why is there no corresponding policy to promote adoption? These businesses are ignoring the possibility that many employees may simply need a little more help to carry their baby to term. Instead of blindly paying people to end an unborn child's life, companies should consider paying them to welcome that life into the world. That's why my business has decided to give up to $7,500 to employees who want to have their baby and give it up for adoption. We're not alone—a Texas-based insurance company, Buffer, is also paying for adoptions as well as covering the full costs of birth for employees who keep their children.

Source:  Newsweek.com

Rex explains his motivation and makes his case for A Culture of Life. Maybe you might agree.

Companies Should Support Adoption, Not Abortion 

Peter Rex

Here’s a picture taken at the Natural History Museum in London.

Baby In Womb by Peter O’Connor is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

+++